4 Oct
2005
4 Oct
'05
9:56 p.m.
From: "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com>
I'll gladly implement this policy if/when we get a policy_ptr. Until then, I definately think the pimpl library is the way to go.
Way to go where? I don't see it as another variation of smatr_ptr within boost. As your own library - of course.
If one is looking for a pimpl library one won't look at the smart_ptr library until and unless one recognizes that it is a type of smart pointer. Thus, a separate library, even if implemented using the smart_ptr library, would be helpful. -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;