Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto@cs.aau.dk> writes:
If we fix ADL for C++0x, I would favor what the proposal currently says (I think the fact that you can forget using std::begin; is of minor importance).
If we don't fix ADL in C++0x, then we might consider (1) ADL customization points via range_begin()/range_end()/range_size() or (2) go for a class like range_traits<T>::begin()...ect.
ADL is going to get "fixed" by concept support, and not by Herb's idea, FWIW. Just my opinion, but well-founded and I have no time to go into details now (sorry). So if you think the shape of C++0x should be a factor in this discussion, you should be thinking about how all this relates to the concepts proposals. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com