8 May
2006
8 May
'06
3:50 p.m.
On 5/8/06, Christopher Kohlhoff <chris@kohlhoff.com> wrote:
Hi Felipe,
[snipped]
Yep, fair enough - it's probably better to be safe. Although it does raise the question of what to call the functions in the proposal for TR2. Any suggestions?
It seems to me that there were some discussion about ADL hooking naming convention, IIRC for the range library, in this mailing list. But I didnt read.
Cheers, Chris
Best regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida