On Tuesday, November 23, 2004, at 02:29 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
Deane Yang <deane_yang@yahoo.com> writes:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 06:04:20PM +0100, Joaqu?n M? L?pez Mu?oz wrote:
Attached please find a little more stylish reformulation of the same idea.
(bad thing is it looks too much like Tintin's "Destination Moon" rocket.) What's wrong with that exactly? :-) I still like that logo best. I think it could be improved by putting "++" on the stripe, because the ring around the rocket looks like a "C"
I find this one too static, compared to Dave's attempts. It does have the sense of solidity that some have asked for, but I'd rather have a more dynamic feel (which reflects, I think, more accurately what boost is. Much of boost is not for the faint-hearted.)
Thanks. Actually I thought that Joaquín's design was plenty dynamic and better than mine on simplicity grounds. I do agree about the ring and the ++. Put a little white gap between the rocket and the ring at the intersection, and you've got your "C."
Hmm... two little puffs of exhaust could be +'s and the third could be a 'C'-ring. It's kinda' cartoony, but fun.