Re: [boost] different matrix library?

joel wrote:

It only exists in our internal SVN server right now. We're working hard to get it out asap. Anyway, it's the exact same set of features except it use proto and better understanding of fusion/MPL and provide an openMP support. Interface is the same except for matrix settings that use round lambda instead of template class.

Ok. I am looking through the documentation of version 2, there are things I like, and some things to lesser extend, mainly because it tries to mimic Matlab. Have you considered creating a more C++-like domain-specific language, taking elements from various domain-specific languages? Cheers, Rutger