From: Caleb Epstein <caleb.epstein@gmail.com>
Ergo I restate my case that this library should NOT be called Pimpl. Maybe PimplHolder or something like that, but calling it Pimpl confuses at least two people :-)
I was never confused as to whether this library would magically implement the impl class, though I think Asger may have flirted with the idea of forwarding functions. Nevertheless, I can see calling the class pimpl_ptr, if that suffix would clarify matters for you. That also highlights what Arkadiy--if I remember correctly-- commented on: this is just a special case for a PBSP, with smart_ptr (in the Review queue) being the likely candidate. -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;