Matt Gruenke wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
I agree. And to me "pixel-format" is unknown, confusing and inaccurate. The worst of the worst. It's like calling a std::vector a data-container just because the std::vector does not quite follow the "classical" term of vector. Let's not be too pedantic.
I'm not sure that's a good analogy. In what ways are you suggesting vector an inaccurate description of that container?
I do not want to digress but look up the definition of "vector" in a dictionary and you'll see _overloaded_ meanings, and those meanings were invented before computer science. Ok, I've had enough bike-shed debates. As I said, I'll leave it up to the authors to do the right thing. Cheers, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net