"Eric Niebler" <eric@boost-consulting.com> writes:
I'll have to get back to you on that one. I don't think there's a nice way, yet.
Actually, I think there is. There is a nested template called "argument_pack" that /seems/ to do the right thing, but it's undocumented. And the function-call operators do not use it to declare their return types, so it's anybody's guess whether they're always equivalent.
There's also a nested template called "bind", but it's not clear what it is for, or how it differs from "argument_pack".
We're taking care of it.
Another feature request: it would be nice if parameters<> were a valid MPL sequence that I could manipulate with MPL algorithms.
It already is an MPL sequence.
No, it's not. An argument pack is an MPL sequence, but a parameters<> instantiation is not.
Oh, I see. What would you use that capability for? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com