17 Jun
2005
17 Jun
'05
2:08 p.m.
"John Maddock" <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:
Like taking the address of an overloaded function or function template instantiation ??
Surely you can always just declare your function type as a typedef in that case, without going through function_type?
function_type is only useful in that it unpacks an mpl sequence defining the argument list into the function type, but that's only useful if you have an the mpl sequence to begin with. It's those situations I'm finding hard to imagine at present.
I have a use for it -- but it's less useful if the sequence is nonuniform and fails to include the class type of member functions ;-) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com