8 Oct
2008
8 Oct
'08
8:14 a.m.
Raindog wrote:
Robert Jones wrote:
Not being a veteran of these things, I'm wondering why it is that 1.37 is following on so soon after 1.36?
- Rob. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
I believe they are targeting quarterly releases. Odd numbers being less stable than even number releases I think is what I understood.
There's no difference between odd and even numbered releases for C++ Boost. Odd/even is Linux convention. - Volodya