18 Jun
2005
18 Jun
'05
8:42 p.m.
Andy Little wrote:
"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> wrote
Ah - thanks! We'll want to use this instead of function_type_arity, so default arguments work. Adding an assertion that the arity of the function is greater or equal to the number of elements in the tuple would be nice.
Unfortunately because its a pointer to a function it wont handle the default args, at least not in my test above. (OTOH this sounds reasonably sensible)
<WHUMMM>Stupid me</WHUMM> Of course! I'm sorry. It seems I'm doing too much things simultanously at present... Regards, Tobias