"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> writes:
"Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <joaquin@tid.es> wrote in message news:421D9494.A06BA029@tid.es...
|As for BoostUnordered, I really don't think it qualifies for fasttrack |review (see the requirements at |http://boost.org/more/formal_review_process.htm#Fast-Track).
yeah, that definition does not take into account things in the tr that are not in boost.
I can't see any good reason this should not be a fast-track review.
Fast track reviews were supposed to be reserved for components that are already in use as an implementation detail by one or more boost libraries, and that we now want to make publicly-accessible. If we are going to change that policy, we ought to be very clear about _why_ we're doing that, and just what the new policy should be. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com