
20 Oct
2012
20 Oct
'12
3:48 p.m.
Le 20/10/12 17:35, Andrey Semashev a écrit :
On Saturday 20 October 2012 17:27:40 Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 20/10/12 13:13, Andrey Semashev a écrit :
Is try_unique_lock a new lock type? How is it different from unique_lock with try_to_lock argument? The single difference is that the constructor will try to lock instead of lock the mutex. If nobody needs it I just deprecate Mutex::scoped_try_lock and signal in the doc that the user can use a unique_lock using the try_lock_t tag. IMHO, there is no need for this separate lock type, the same can be achieved with unique_lock.
Thanks for you quick answers. Vicente