Rob Stewart <stewart@sig.com> writes:
From: "Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk>
I am pleased to formally announce that the Typeof library has been accepted into Boost.
Congratulations Arkadiy and Peder.
There were 3 reviews, all in favour of accepting the library.
While I'm not questioning the value of accepting this library specifically, doesn't it seem less than ideal to accept a library that -- for whatever reasons -- garnered only three reviews?
Yes.
While the library was truly peer reviewed, and the reviews were by knowledgeable folk, the base of input is narrow as a result. Should this be the norm?
No. Not sure what we can do about it. I think the review wizard should weigh in here. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com