22 May
2008
22 May
'08
8:42 p.m.
Oops, your right. 'back' would be a lot better, given the c++ precedent (std::list).
Indeed. back() is excellent.
Still, does it justify breaking backwards compatibility?
I suggested to deprecate, rather than removing anything, in order to avoid breaking backwards compatibility. I just meant to suggest documenting it as deprecated. -- John