
19 Sep
2005
19 Sep
'05
9:07 a.m.
Daniel James wrote:
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
[snip]
The good news is that it's fixed in the latest compiler release. But should the failure be marked as expected for older versions of the compiler, or should a workaround be added to the test itself? Any preferences?
Thanks for looking into this. I think I'd go for the workaround - as the library itself isn't failing. Can you let me know the version number which works? Or feel free to make the change yourself, if you prefer.
I checked in a workaround for the test on the RC branch. Markus