On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Thomas Heller <thom.heller@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:07 PM, David Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
At Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:42:48 +0800, Joel de Guzman wrote:
And how is anybody supposed to find this from a Boost distribution when Phoenix is not listed as a library ? My understanding is that Phoenix works outside of Spirit and so should be documented separately, with whatever links Spirit decides to have to it being Spirit's own business. But if I am wrong and Phoenix is a library only to be used from Spirit, or always to be connected to Spirit and never used otherwise, I will gladly stand corrected.
:-) Patience...
Phoenix has since been a Spirit sub-library until its Boost review sometime ago. After we get all things in order and after a mini-review, Phoenix will be a full fledged Boost citizen and will have a top level documentation.
Why a mini-review? Haven't you now met all the conditions of Phoenix' conditional acceptance?
IIRC, a mini review was one of the points for conditional acceptance.
Yes, that's my recollection as well. But really, it's just a formality. This project has been nurtured for years by some of the brightest minds in the Boost community. That's has done more for Phoenix than any review could! :-) Daniel Walker