18 Jan
2011
18 Jan
'11
2:21 p.m.
Beman Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto@cs.aau.dk> wrote:
...
I'm fine with BOOST_ASSERT_MSG(). Since we are adding assert.hpp I would like to see
BOOST_ASSERT_IF() BOOST_ASSERT_IF_MSG()
as well. It is really much clearer to read and maintain than
BOOST_ASSERT( !foo() || condition );
I like it!
I'm working on a Boost quality implementation now. Stay tuned.
Should there be BOOST_VERIFY variants also? Thanks for addressing this Beman. Jeff