[boost] Re: [boost.tr1?] request for a hash<> implementation

JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:

What I'm interested in in the short term is the hash<> functor alone. Of course unordered containers are much more interesting, but this will have to undergo the usual review process, I guess. Do you think we can put your hash<> implementation under boost/functional/hash.hpp and have some short docs for it?

I've just uploaded a new version. I've rewritten the hash functions based on Peter's design. I'll write some documentation and some more tests soon. Daniel