operative phrase is "seem to think"..... I challenge the word think...but it's their work and they're free to say how it's used (even if they are distressingly misinformed). At Wednesday 2004-06-02 22:31, you wrote:
Walter Landry wrote:
Darren Cook <darren@dcook.org> wrote:
If so I wonder if the GSL authors would be open to a dual, boost-compatible license so that a boost library could borrow code as it needed to, rather than having to re-invent the wheel.
Almost certainly not. They are not even willing to entertain going to the LGPL. There used to be a blurb on their website saying that if you can't handle the GPL, then use something else.
I just checked their website, and it still reads this way. The authors of GSL seem to think that anything other that the GPL prevents scientific collaboration. Thus, an FAQ entry that asks if GSL code can ever be used in commercial software says simply, "No. Sorry."
John Phillips
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"