8 Nov
2004
8 Nov
'04
4:17 p.m.
At 08:10 AM 11/8/2004, John Torjo wrote:
No comments of the code itself, however I'm not a fan of rng as a namespace, I keep reading Random Number Generator.
helpfully though I can't think of an alternative!
range (likely to conflict?) irange (likely to be used as a variable name in place of 'i' ?) irl (not good either) rangelib (too long?)
Tradition would dictate "ranges"
I'm fine with ranges:: namespace, although I find it a little big (containing too many chars).
But it is way better than "rng", IMO. I'm like John, and read rng as random number generator. --Beman