On 31 January 2011 10:32, Joel de Guzman <joel@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
I'm with John here. And I can say this: we, the top commiters have no complaints about the tools. We will use whatever tools are available. (at least I speak for Hartmut, John, Volodya and I; but I have a strong feeling that Steven and Daniel agree too).
I'm actually a bit of a tool geek, but I tend to 'mute' those discussions because if I joined in I'd never escape. FWIW I develop off line using git-svn. Git wasn't my first choice of version control system, but none of the others had good enough subversion integration. I think others have explained the problems with using git for boost, and unless they're addressed I don't think it's viable. Anyway, git is old hat, we should use fossil. Daniel