"vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> writes:
Anthony, I would prefer you propose for review the n2627 interfacce. Why do you propose for review un interface that is outdated? It seems to me a lost of time.
I wrote the code for the boost submission 8-9 months ago, in accordance with the then-current C++0x proposal (with a few extras) and it has been in the review queue since. I have since focused my energy on my commercial library, rather than on a library which may or may not be accepted into Boost, with or without changes (especially since there is a competing submission). If a futures library is accepted into Boost, I will gladly work with Braddock to update the library with any features required by the review, including conformance to N2627. Anthony -- Anthony Williams Author of C++ Concurrency in Action | http://www.manning.com/williams Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Just Software Solutions Ltd, Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK