Re: [boost] [string] proposal

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 14:07, Ivan Le Lann <ivan.lelann@free.fr> wrote:

*My* *guess* is that Artyom think that:

os_func ((s1 + s2 + s3 + ... + s100).c_str()); // s for std::string

is dramatically faster than:

os_func ((c1 + c2 + c3 + ... + c100).to_string().c_str()); // c for "boost::chain"

Aren't they perform the same? Actually with lazy evaluation the latter will be faster. -- Yakov