[boost] Re: [boost.range] renaming empty() to is_empty()

I'd vote no (i.e., I'd stick with empty). It is admittedly a bad name, but it's even worse to depart from STL terminology. I don't think it'll pose that many problems since anybody who delves into Boost.Range will be already familiar with STL containers and the empty() memfun.

Second that. Regards, Jurko