Re: [boost] [shared_array] Why not in C++11 ?

Does anyone know why 'boost::shared_array<>' was not made part of C++11, since pretty much all the other smart pointers were?

Even in Boost, as of 1.53.0, shared_ptr<T[]> is a better alternative than shared_array<T>. We just need to get Boost's shared_ptr<T[]> and shared_ptr<T[N]> to be part of the future standard (instead of adding shared_array to the future standard). Glen