18 Nov
2004
18 Nov
'04
12:47 p.m.
Vladimir Prus wrote:
Peter Dimov wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
That still leaves the question of single path vs separate path and wpath classes. A single path class looks very good in a lot of ways but we still have to decide how to deal with this case on a dual narrow/wide O/S: path p( "foo" ); p /= L"bar";
How about a rule that if any portion of a path is wide, the entire path gets converted to wide?
It's either that, or preserving the original width (thickness?). I'm not sure which is better, but see below.
The very same question arises with path/wpath:
path p( "foo") p /= wpath(L"bar");
We can avoid it by not defining a mixed operator/=, though.