Re: [boost] [result_of, phoenix] Inconsistency between result_of and tr1_result_of

On 5/16/2012 5:15 AM, Michel Morin wrote: <snip>

Shouldn't we provide specializations for both `result_of` and `tr1_result_of` to make result_of and tr1_result_of equivalent?

Yes. Can you file bug reports?

(Additional question: Should we avoid the specialization of result_of when we use decltype-based result_of?)

Probably. More bug reports, please! :-) -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com