Re: [boost] [any] Divergence between Boost.Any and standard library proposal

On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Antony Polukhin wrote:

2013/5/4 Beman Dawes :

...

...

* ~any() is noexcept

By convention, the standard library doesn't add noexcept to destructors. I've forgotten the rationale for that.

Isn't the rationale that the language defines all destructors are noexcept by default? (I recall that at least being discussed, I think it was accepted?) Tony