Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?

Alexander Lamaison <awl03 <at> doc.ic.ac.uk> writes:

Or just BOOST_TEST as that is now the default testing tool? TEST_CHECK an TEST_ASSERTION etc. are redundant as it says the same thing twice.

I need 3 names: warn, check and require levels. What do you propose? Gennadiy