19 May
2014
19 May
'14
5:51 p.m.
Antony Polukhin wrote:
2014-05-19 19:26 GMT+04:00 Adam Wulkiewicz
: Or would putting it in boost::utility/BOOST_UTILITY be a better idea?
boost::utility:: namespace looks reasonable. +1
I don't like it very much. There's nothing particularly utility-specific about ignore_unused_variable and if/when we decide to move it somewhere else, we'll have to fix all the uses. A namespace "utility" shouldn't even exist (except for implementation details).