-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/03/2010 08:04 AM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
[...] There may be legitimate reason to use COW in your library, but because of the foregoing, you must ensure that you have applied move semantics correctly, write the code properly to avoid unnecessary copies, and prove that COW remains beneficial in a wide range of use cases in a MT test.
That's what I'm trying to do. :-) Though I'm open to alternatives, like move semantics. I may have identified something that's slowing down the move implementation in the library, I'll try it today. - -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkve89YACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wTJzgCgux5pqNe5czQD2tAEgous0DF/ Nn0AoISXjIjw35Qf30mLeF4lqmjvEmzK =zijU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----