29 Oct
2005
29 Oct
'05
4:24 p.m.
Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com> writes:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
A lot of these failures are for gcc-2.95.3-linux. Do we care enough about 2.95.3 nowadays to consider it a release platform?
I vageuely remember trying to kill GCC 2.95.3 support at one point, but was convinced otherwise. We could just mark it as unusable on new libraries/tests that support it but retain backward compatibility on ^ don't??
those libraries that do.
If not "don't," how will we know we're retaining backward compatibility? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com