-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 23 October 2009, Eric Niebler wrote:
I don't like the idea of a boost/<lib>/all.hpp header. Does that really drag in everything? Debug utilities? Boost.Python integration? Boost.Serialization support? Typeof registrations? Support for Zlib and Bzip compression that will require downloading, configuring, building, and linking to additional external libraries? I find all.hpp headers generally useless.
How do these objections to boost/D/all.hpp not also apply when it is called boost/D.hpp?
File D.hpp is either standalone (if no directory D exists) or includes all files in subdirectory D. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrh0x4ACgkQ5vihyNWuA4XUJQCbB8wxUTum3dmqzs1W8Xb+JkZk xKkAnjb58qdQwfGf3OVVNpRMzTwZI3wJ =FQaP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----