17 Nov
2013
17 Nov
'13
1:54 a.m.
On 17 Nov 2013 at 0:41, Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
1. Should this library be accepted into Boost?
YES.
Thanks for the feedback. Very useful for my report.
One question though, I'm not totally clear if there is a remarkable difference in performance and binary size between with RTTI using std and without RTTI using this library.
You make a valid point. It's been many years since I last wrote code capable of working with RTTI off, and therefore my knowledge of how well modern compilers generate RTTI is seriously out of date. I have probably been overly conservative as a result by working with a decade old mental model. Niall -- Currently unemployed and looking for work. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/