Beman Dawes ha escrito:
"Olaf van der Spek" <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote in message news:b2cc26e40604260753h6dce7c95k85dd624cc29dadea@mail.gmail.com...
On 4/26/06, Jose <jmalv04@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/06, Paul A Bristow <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote:
to escape from the async-ness which doesn't seem important in the bigger picture into which this library promises to fit in future?
boost::asio big contribution is in async handling ( networking now and file i/o in the future) so I think is hard to find a better, shorter and more precise name
Why should it be shorter? I think async_io is both better and more precise as it's immediately clear what the a stands for.
I agree. But if the plan is to also provide synchronous I/O, then the name should be broadened, IMO.
UIO (Unified/Universal I/O)? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo