Re: [boost] Interest in an arbitrary precision library?

David Abrahams wrote:

IMO, if you don't want to compete with GMP, you should at least allow the library to be built as a wrapper over GMP.

I was thinking of something that would allow for the user to switch out algorithms easily. Using the GMP as an example implementation of this would probably be good. It's not quite that I don't want to compete with GMP's speed -- but I don't think that a portably designed, pure C++ library is going to be able to do it. Joel Eidsath