On 7/28/10 4:06 AM, Thomas Heller wrote:
The functors in question didn't have a polymorphic return type. It was just a matter, that the non-const operator() overload was never called. Code in question looks something like this:
struct X { typedef void result_type;
void operator()() {} // (1) void operator()() const {} // (2) };
template<typename F> void g(F f) { F const& h(f);
h(); //<-- (2) was expected to be called here, but (1) gets called }
int main { using boost::phoenix::bind;
X x; bind(x); // binding x in some non-const context }
I think phoenix behaves correctly here. But I am not really sure, because it must have been some justification to end up us a Boost.Bind testcase.
2 other tests (bind_eq_test.cpp and bind_function_test.cpp) are only working because i left out some stuff which isn't implemented yet. bind_placeholder_test.cpp is not working as expected, because phoenix3 has no support for real costum placeholders (as in the purpose of this test).
You might want to re-post this with [bind] in the heading to solicit a reply from Peter Dimov; (maybe CC him too). It's best to fully understand the rationale behind the test. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net