On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Would it be possible for some one to craft a logo which has the word "Proposed" plastered over the normal boost logo. This would better communicate the true intention. That this a library which is intended to become part of boost, but which hasn't been officially accepted yet.
I'd love to get my hands on something like that.
And I've made one for cpp-netlib. You can check that now -- please let me know if this meets your standards for clearly indicating the the library is Proposed for future inclusion into the Boost C++ Library. Thanks again for pointing it out. If I've hurt anybody's feelings I apologize and hopefully this addresses concerns about the use of the Boost logo in the documentation. Have a good day and I hope this helps! -- Dean Michael Berris cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/deanberris linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com