9 Sep
2004
9 Sep
'04
7:04 a.m.
"John Torjo" <john.lists@torjo.com> wrote in message news:4140023B.2070608@torjo.com... | Thomas Wenisch wrote: | > On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, tom brinkman wrote: | > | > | >>With 10-15 days allocated per review and a 5-10 day buffer, we will be able | >>to review at-most 1 to 2 reviews per month or 12 to 24 libraries per year. | > | > | > A goal of 24 review per year strikes me as far too ambitious. I think 12 | > libraries is a more realistic goal (and allows for some dead time, such as | > right before a release, where no reviews are in progress). | > | | I second that. 12 reviews per year is quite enough. I would rather see a number that reflects how big the libraries are. Some are small, some are huge. br Thorsten