c) I believe that this is the reason the very ambitious undertaking "sailed thtough" the boost review process - (unlike most others). Aspiring
"Joaquín Mª López Muñoz" <joaquin@tid.es> wrote in message news:41AE1469.543AD33E@tid.es... Robert Ramey ha escrito: library
authors should study this as an example.
I think I have to give here due credit to Pavel, who acted as my private reviewer for almost a year. I objected to many of his criticisms, but he definitely never let me go sloppy. I think this mentorship role should be stressed more here at Boost.
I would note that Pavel played the same role regarding the serialization library. He pointed innumerable errors and suggested corrections - most of them I implemented. I'm doubtful this this is generally recognized as it should be as most of occurred during private communications. As a reward (or punishment) we have the serialization library working with borland compilers. I'm still considering the observations regarding container serialization. This was originally significantly different. After a spirited exchange I, and though I had some reservations, I came to implement the current one. I'm sure that the last word has been written on this. Robert Ramey