On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
ctx seems like a needlessly short abbreviation. Wouldn't it be better and more consistent with the rest of Boost to ask users to write
using namespace ctx = boost::context;
if they want something short?
I was thinking the same thing actually. +1 AFAICT, it seems like the general convention is that if the name of the library is Boost.Beetlejuice, then the namespace will be boost::beetlejuice. The word 'context' isn't really long enough to justify breaking that tradition IMO.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost