20 Oct
2004
20 Oct
'04
1:01 p.m.
Peter Dimov wrote:
Yes. But it's possible to have standalone "normalization" function, and still use default normalized representation for the string class.
Thereby assuming that all users need to pay for normalization (twice) on every comparison?
Noway, of course.
Or maybe you are arguing that the string should always be kept in a particular normalized form?
That's what I meant. - Volodya