29 Nov
2009
29 Nov
'09
4:39 a.m.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:52 PM, John Zwinck <jzwinck@athenacr.com> wrote:
Daniel James wrote:
'erase' would be better. But as a temporary measure I'll add something like that, you might want to file a ticket to make sure I don't forget and track what I do.
I have created a ticket: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3693
Instead of making a new function name, why not a function overload: iterator erase(iterator it); // original void erase(iterator it, no_return); // no_return is an empty global created struct so you can just call m.erase(it, no_return);