[boost] Re: special_functions_test

It would also help if you added the construct you wrote

template<typename T> struct string_type_name;

#define DEFINE_TYPE_NAME(Type) \ template<> struct string_type_name<Type> \ { \ static char const * _() \ { \ return #Type; \ } \ }

to a common header, as I believe I am not the only one who would benefit from it!

Usually I am using RTTI for this king of task. But I will think about it. (MPL book have an excesize to do just something like this)

BTW, what now replaces unit_test_log ?

Nothing. Use unit_test_log. But without ::instance() Gennadiy