Re: [boost] Macro fo rBOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_MAX_DIGITS10 or useBOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_LOWEST

I have recently used BOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_LOWEST to act as a proxy for support of numeric_limits<T>:: max_digits10 (as correctly suggested by John Maddock).

Do we need yet another new macro for this, say

BOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_MAX_DIGITS10

or continue to use BOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_LOWEST as a proxy.

I think the latter will suffice (despite its unfortunate name for this task).

But I think an addition to the configuration macro reference docs would be useful.

Actually, this is one C++11 macro that Marshall missed for renaming. Maybe if we asked him nicely ;-) he would volunteer to rename this one to BOOST_NO_CXX11_NUMERIC_LIMITS? Cheers, John.