23 Nov
2008
23 Nov
'08
12:54 p.m.
David Abrahams skrev:
on Sat Nov 22 2008, Tomas Puverle <Tomas.Puverle-AT-morganstanley.com> wrote:
Anyway, I think a lot of people on this forum are missing the point: I'm not claiming that the old behaviour is in some way better or worse. I am saying the following: 1) Is the behavioural change too much of a diversion from previous expected (documented) functionality that the new change is in fact a defect
We haven't established that, IMO. Unless I missed it, nobody has shown where in the old documentation it was stated that a default-constructed iterator range is empty.
Well, I think the docs stated that if( rng ) was valid, and conversion to bool was based on .empty(). -Thorsten