[http://www.boost.org/community/policy.html#quoting] [rearranging...] On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Christian Henning <chhenning@gmail.com>wrote:
Hey everyone!
I don't know what the protocol is for this, but since I have been posting occasionally for a while and have offered to be a Review Manager but am relatively unknown to the community (which, again, means that I will completely understand and won't be offended in the slightest if you
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Gregory Crosswhite <gcross@phys.washington.edu> wrote: politely
decline my offer to be a Review Manager :-) ) and have never introduced myself I figured that now might be as good a time as any:
I am a graduate student who will be finishing up my PhD in Physics in the next month. My field is roughly quantum computing/quantum simulation, and my specialty is writing software that solves problems in the field of quantum error correction. My web page, which gives an overview of my background, is here: http://students.washington.edu/gcross/index.html
Cheers, Greg
Hi Greg, the rule for being a Review Manager is that such person has
already committed a library into boost. That's as I understand it.
Regards, Christian
We have an individual (Greg) willing to manage the review, and this certainly does not happen for every library entering the review queue, so it seems counterproductive to discourage Greg's participation. Since Greg does not (yet?) have a library committed to boost, perhaps he can act as a sort of assistant review manager under the guide of one or more boost contributors. Greg would have usual responsibilities of following the review and aggregating the submitted review emails into a coherent review summary, which the guiding boost contributors would approve or amend. Just a suggestion; I, too, do not have a library committed to boost, so I tend to think my opinion naturally carries less weight. - Jeff