10 May
2005
10 May
'05
10:24 p.m.
Daniel Wallin wrote:
Jonathan Turkanis wrote: [...]
Yes, I'm interested. I'm pretty comfortable implementing the current feature set with above syntax. I'd certainly be interested in you ideas about extensibility, however.
Here's some PP-code that allows a pretty optimal syntax.
Thanks, Daniel! I wasn't sure how to handle cv-qualifiers, and so was pretty much resigned to using CONST_FN or something like that, and ignoring volatile in the macro-based IDL. One thing that remains is to figure out how to handle base interface lists and member typedefs. Any suggestions would be very welcome.
Works with GCC and probably nothing else, but maybe it's possible to port to other preprocessors.
I'll definitely need help with that. Jonathan