Jeff Garland wrote:
Looking at the boost-wide reports today, testmicrosec_time_clock is marked as failing red on a whole series of compilers. However, they should be 'green' (and have been in past reports) as they have been explicitly marked as failing:
I noted the same thing. http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32_metacomm/developer/pro... has only a couple of yellow cells and boost-wide reports have a huge number of yellow ones. While we're at it, I have two questions about boost-wide regression reports 1. How they are related with individual reports? Are they generated from individual reports. 2. Old style reports showed warnings, for example see: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html New style reports do not. I find it not very good. I'd really want boost to be warning-free on gcc 3.4 and fixed some errors already. But I'm not sure the above page is up-to-date, and it's hard to search for warning in it. Maybe, new style reports could show warnings too? - Volodya